One of the contributors to this site put the story of the Stray as part of this chapter here. This story is very painful and dark and reader is warned to scan it rather than reading it! One advertisement of Satan is to urge humans to watch pain and destruction until they become ready to inflict pain and destruction on others.

 

Satan originally means "a plotting enemy" of human. That enmity is different with other types of hostilities that humans encounter in each other and with nature. In those occasions one side wants to survive himself in expense of destruction of adversaries.

 

Hostility of Satan is "ontological." I mean, Satan does not want anybody or anything to remain. Satan wants annihilation for all. Description of Satan is the discussion of some other chapters.

Satan inflicts unjustified pain on human and encourage humans to behold it as an entertainment. It promises to participants that that brings knowledge of god and discovery of death towards overcoming on it. That brings Satan to the position of power in the aggregates of humans.

 

That promise is favourite desirable of rulers and medicine man and therefore that takes anti-Christ to the temple in its historical evolution that has been recorded as mostly unacceptable fable. Essence of Satan is so evading and beyond belief that man cannot accept it as being real.

 

Ruler wants knowledge to gain power. Medicine man by his profession wants overcoming the death and he accepts watching pain in hope to find or administer cure.

 

Satan wants hostility among men but kindness and cooperativeness towards Satan. Aim of Satan is not friendship. It is annihilation of man.

 

Pain of Messiah: Beginning of our argument is pain. We say Christ was suffered for the sin of man. So if we want to ask god for alternative creation of world, a world relieved of pain why should that god's incipience should be accompanied by pain? Is it similar to delivering a child accompanied with pain of labour?

 

People said that Romans nailed the wrists of Jesus Christ to the cross and this was the suffering of the 'Son of the God'; what a pain, he even did not die. He survived the cross! People also attribute to Jesus a lot of useless knowledge of every preacher that one should be kind with his neighbours and give a coin to beggars and so on. Accordingly, this is all that Jesus suffered for the stupid sin of someone (Adam) who lost easy life of paradise to hunger and death on the earth. And he did that for a humble apple, and it was because his wife intrigued him. What was the tool of the wife for intriguing? Before eating the apple they were not aware of the sexual organ of each other; peacefully were next to each other, almost naked, without noticing that they were naked. They even were not aware that they had that organ, let alone use it for intriguing or become intrigued. When there is no other man or woman around and no sexual life then what is the meaning of intriguing? Why human being needs such a nonsense story for generations and so vehemently embrace such a myth?

 

You might say that it is symbolic. Then go and ask Pop or an archbishop, or any ayatollah or a rabbi or Dalai Lama what is the meaning of the symbol. Do they know? No, only Jesus knows.

 

In Roman Empire even a wealthy person could crucify his chef if the chef could not provide prestigiously for his special banquets, without any court or answering anybody. Every week Roman authorities crucified scores of people mostly innocent who had little children and were thirsty and had half grey beards and looked very humble in talking and demeanour.

 

In the stories we read that Noah had eight hundred years time to convince people that a flood would come and take them with, and Noah would be safe and had the know-how to tell them how they could survive safely by joining to him. He received harassment and mockery and almost nobody joined to him and a lot of other unbelievable things such as flooding the earth to the top of highest mountains and taking all the animals to a humble one-man-made do-it-yourself ship. You say it is a nonsense fable, or it is a symbolic story about fights of human being against the nature. Your reasons are feasibility and possibility and so on. Why for many thousands years people have accepted this story? You say that they are fanatics. Well, why do they depict people of Noah's time so intellectual and objective? Why not those people were fanatics? Why they were not simpleton and scary and did not start to pray and to beg Noah to do something for them to save them? They were intellectuals and asked Noah for hard evidence such as some satellite pictures and data and atmospheric models, but after them people lost their wisdom and started to believe in retrospect that such things had actually happened and they did not enquire for any evidence. Moreover, situation became reversed and non-believers became object of harassment and mockery.

 

Hence, crucification is not the pain Christ tolerated. That is not pain of Messiah.

 

Man sheds tears when he tolerates pains, especially when that suffering is mental rather than physical. Anti-Christ told Messiah that It suffers Messiah until He sheds blood from His eyes instead of tears.

 

Man might condemns himself to pain for two reasons. Both are connected to his desire to transcend to Spring of life. First, and this can be witnessed much even in modern world, he imitates physical pain in simulating feeling of companionship to Messiah.

 

Messiah says, "that should not exceed a moderate lamenting. Flesh of human is respectable and pain to it should be spared for his confrontation with nature."

 

Second, and this happens rare among humans, mixing pain with his desire of reproduction. This is temptation of Satan that intrigues him interpreting reproduction as the original sin of human. This is the pain that Anti-Christ sends to man surrogating human being (Original sin is that the man surrogates Satan). Satan watches man and fulfils when he suffers himself instead of freeing himself from the pain. Man might think and become delved into enchantment of Satan that pleasure is not desirable and should be accompanied with pain of Christ.

 

Messiah says, "This pain is forbidden. It is a satanic sin and ultimate goal of Satan to inflict pain on human on arousal of human phallus which is so hated by Satan. Reproduction, that is, sexual behaviour of man should be accompanied with joy and pleasure, even if it does not conclude to reproduction or full commitment of participating couple. Should be prepared (if available and should become available for all through altruistic or mandatory collective and shared struggle of human societies) with moderate and decent food and music and red wine and tenderness and romance in comfort of time and place secluded from others, not as taboo and sin. Pain should be transcended into unifying with Pain of Messiah that was offered to mountains but they refused to accept, as they knew that they would be crushed under it.

People perform pain of Jesus Christ as a one day suffering of Him; flogging Him and forcing him into carrying his cross across a path to his destined death place and nailing his wrists to the cross. And believers belive that god relieved him of a prolonged death on the cross.

I began from the story of "Stray" since she could n't tell her pain. Stray could n't complain to anybody; could n't ask for empathy. Pain of Christ and other messengers of god was of that kind. Pain of Messiah is that kind of pain. You need to discover it by yourself not by telling you.

Anti-Christ suffers Messiah in a way unprecedented for humans to grasp.